Thursday, 31 March 2016

01.04.16

ANSWER SUBMISSION FORM  >> http://goo.gl/forms/vO0RW4RDH8

"LIKE elaborately plumed birds…we preen and strut and display our t-values." That was Edward Leamer's
uncharitable description of his profession in 1983. Mr Leamer, an economist at the University of California in
Los Angeles, was frustrated by empirical economists' emphasis on measures of correlation over underlying
questions of cause and effect, such as whether people who spend more years in school go on to earn more in
later life. Hardly anyone, he wrote gloomily, "takes anyone else's data analyses seriously". To make his
point, Mr Leamer showed how different (but apparently reasonable) choices about which variables to include
in an analysis of the effect of capital punishment on murder rates could lead to the conclusion that the death
penalty led to more murders, fewer murders, or had no effect at all.
In the years since, economists have focused much more explicitly on improving the analysis of cause and
effect, giving rise to what Guido Imbens of Harvard University calls "the causal literature". The techniques at
the heart of this literature—in particular, the use of so-called "instrumental variables"—have yielded insights
into everything from the link between abortion and crime to the economic return from education. But these
methods are themselves now coming under attack.
Instrumental variables have become popular in part because they allow economists to deal with one of the
main obstacles to the accurate estimation of causal effects—the impossibility of controlling for every last
influence. Mr Leamer's work on capital punishment demonstrated that the choice of controls matters hugely.
Putting too many variables into a model ends up degrading the results. Worst of all, some relevant variables
may simply not be observable. For example, the time someone stays in school is probably influenced by his
innate scholastic ability, but this is very hard to measure. Leaving such variables out can easily lead
econometricians astray. What is more, the direction of causation is not always clear. Working out whether
deploying more policemen reduces crime, for example, is confused by the fact that more policemen are
allocated to areas with higher crime rates.
Instrumental variables are helpful in all these situations. Often derived from a quirk in the environment or in
public policy, they affect the outcome only through their influence on the input variable while at the same
time being uncorrelated with what is left out . The job of instrumental variables is to ensure that the omission
of factors from an analysis—does not end up producing inaccurate results.
In an influential early example of this sort of study, Joshua Angrist of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(MIT) and Alan Krueger of Princeton University used America's education laws to create an instrumental
variable based on years of schooling. These laws mean that children born earlier in the year are older when
they start school than those born later in the year, which means they have received less schooling by the time
they reach the legal leaving-age. Since a child's birth date is unrelated to intrinsic ability, it is a good instrument
for teasing out schooling's true effect on wages. Over time, uses of such instrumental variables have
become a standard part of economists' set of tools. Freakonomics, the 2005 bestseller by Steven Levitt and
Stephen Dubner, provides a popular treatment of many of the techniques. Mr Levitt's analysis of crime during
American election cycles, when police numbers rise for reasons unconnected to crime rates, is a celebrated
example of an instrumental variable.


1. What does Edward Leamer imply by the comment in the first line of the passage?
(a) Birds are hollow creatures who do not care about their fellow birds.
(b) Every economist tries his best to promote his work.
(c) The economists who markets his ideas the most wins in the end like a well plumed bird.
(d) Economists are conceited creatures who display a behaviour similar to plumed birds in the sense
that they put down other economists for promoting themselves.


2. In the schooling example talked about in various parts of the passage , which of the following options
correctly represents 'the input variable', 'the outcome' and 'the left-out variable' in order, from left to
right ?
(a) Scholastic ability, Earnings, Time spent in school.
(b) Earnings, Scholastic ability, Time spent in school.
(c) Time spent in school, Earnings, Scholastic ability.
(d) Time spent in school, Scholastic ability, Earnings.


3. Which of the following would be a suitable title for the passage ?
(a) The role of instrumental variables in "causal literature."
(b) Why the "causal literature" has become popular in economics.
(c) Instrumental variables and their influence on economics.
(d) Instrumental variables- the answer to unobservable factors.


4. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage ?
(a) The techniques of "causal literature" have helped economists to overcome many an obstacle and
have received a unanimous acceptance from all.
(b) Instrumental variables affect the input variable as well as the uncorrelated factors which are left out.
(c) The instrumental variable created by Joshua and Alan makes it reasonably clear that the years of
schooling do not affect the wages earned after schooling.
(d) None of the above.


5. There are two blanks in the following sentence. From the pair of words given, choose the one that fills
the blanks most appropriately. The first word in the pair should fill the first blank.
The present time seems ___________ to bad ideas. In the process of throwing off the shackles of
tradition, we have ended up being quite __________ incipient theories and untested solutions.
(a) hospitable....vulnerable to
(b) hostile....tolerant of
(c) prone....wary of
(d) impervious....exposed to

6. This question presents a sentence, part of which or all of which is underlined. Beneath the sentence you
will find four ways of phrasing the underlined part. The first of these repeats the original; the other three
are different. If you think the original is best, choose the first answer; otherwise choose one of the
others. This question tests correctness and effectiveness of expression. In choosing your answer, follow
the requirements of standard written English; that is, pay attention to grammar, choice of words, and
sentence construction. Choose the answer that produces the most effective sentence; this answer should
be clear and exact, without awkwardness, ambiguity, redundancy, or grammatical error.

(((Companies, which use sophisticated machinery and produce high quality products, understand the
needs))) of their customers.

(a) Companies, which use sophisticated machinery and produce high quality products, understand the
needs
(b) Companies that use sophisticated machinery and produce high quality products understands the
needs
(c) Companies using sophisticated machinery and produce high quality products understand the needs
(d) Companies that use sophisticated machinery and produce high quality products understand the
needs


7. There are five sentences given below. Each sentence has a pair of words that are italicised and highlighted.
From the italicised and highlighted words, select the most appropriate words
(A or B) to form correct sentences. The sentences are followed by options that indicate the words,
which may be selected to correctly complete the set of sentences. From the options given, choose the
most appropriate one.
She refused to be phased (A) / fazed (B) by their insulting remarks. The palace was bombarded with
canon (A) / cannon (B) fires by the enemy. According to the law, all citizens must be given equitable
(A) / equable (B) treatment. As soon as the king died, lawlessness reigned (A) / reined (B) over the city.
Such inflammable (A) / inflammatory (B) remarks could lead to a communal discord.
(a) BBAAB (b) ABAAB (c) BBBAB (d) BAAAA



8. There are two blanks in the following sentence. From the pair of words given, choose the one that fills
the blanks most appropriately. The first word in the pair should fill the first blank.
In the next few years, the sophisticated satellites orbiting the Earth will generate enough data to determine
whether the continents are moving at all or not, ______________ the inchoate ____________
among geographers about the truthfulness of the theory of continental drift.
(a) portending....rumors
(b) forestalling....rift
(c) settling....disturbances
(d) resolving....schism


9. Given below is a paragraph from which the last sentence has been deleted. From the given options,
choose the sentence that completes the paragraph in the most appropriate way.
The question is whether the mind can function as its own cause, without having first experienced a
determining impulse. Not the activity of the mind but only the nature and the origin of this activity are
subject to question. In order to understand this clearly, we start out from the assumption that the mind
is one of the tools of the animal organism in the struggle for existence. From the beginnings of its
functioning in the simplest animals in which it first appears, the mind encounters two factors: on the one
hand, the body of the organism, which produces the mental functions, a body with certain innate needs
and capacities. Let us call it the "ego." On the other hand, there is its environment: the "non-ego,"
which is the negation of the organism. ______________________________________.
(a) The more it understands its own needs and capacities as well as the differences and relationships
among the objects in the environment, the better it solves them.
(b) It is this awareness of the environment that contains the seed of its own negation, which is particularly
striking.
(c) It is this environment that poses the perplexing problems the mind has to solve.
(d) It is the resolution of the antagonism between ego and environment that triggers adaptation




PASSAGE - II
George Orwell wrote Animal Farm, ". . . to discredit the Soviet system by showing its inhumanity and its
back-sliding from ideals [he] valued . . ." Orwell noted that " there exists in England almost no literature of
disillusionment with the Soviet Union.' Instead, that country is viewed either with ignorant disapproval' or
with uncritical admiration.'" The basic synopsis is this: Old Major, an old boar in Manor Farm, tells the other
animals of his dream of "animalism": " . . . Only get rid of Man, and the produce of our labour would be our
own. Almost overnight we would become rich and free.'" The other animals take this utopian idea to heart,
and one day actually do revolt and drive the humans out.
Two pigs emerge as leaders: Napoleon and Snowball. They constantly argued, but one day, due to a difference
over plans to build a windmill, Napoleon exiled Snowball. Almost immediately, Napoleon established a
totalitarian government. Soon, the pigs began to get special favours, until finally, they were indistinguishable
from humans to the other animals. Immediately the reader can begin to draw parallels between the book's
characters and the government in 1917-44 Russia. For example, Old Major, who invented the idea of "animalism,"
is seen as representing Karl Marx, the creator of communism. Snowball represents Trotsky, a Russian
leader after the revolution. He was driven out by Napoleon, who represents Stalin, the most powerful
figure in the country. Napoleon then proceeded to remove the freedoms of the animals, and established a
dictatorship, under the public veil of "animalism." Pigs represent the ruling class because of their stereotype:
dirty animals with insatiable appetites. Boxer, the overworked, incredibly strong, dumb horse represents the
common worker in Russia. The two surrounding farms represent two of the countries on the global stage with
Russia at the time, Germany and England.
Orwell begins his book by criticizing the capitalists and ruling elite, who are represented in Animal Farm by
Mr. Jones, the farmer. He is shown as a negligent drunk, who constantly starved his animals. "His character is
already established as self-indulgent and uncaring." Orwell shows us how, "if only animals became aware of
their strength, we should have no power over them, and that men exploit animals in much the same way as the
rich exploit the proletariat." What was established in Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution was not true communism ("animalism"), which Orwell approved of, where the people owned all the factories and land.
Rather, "state communism" was established, where a central government owned them. Orwell thought that
such a political system, "state communism," was open to exploitation by its leaders. Napoleon, after gaining
complete control, did anything he wished - reserved the best for the pigs, and treated the animals cruelly. The
animals could not do anything, unless they again realized their strength in numbers against their own kind.
Unfortunately, they were too stupid to realize this and accepted the "status quo."


10. All of the following would be in line with Orwell's views except?
(a) Literature which expresses disillusionment about the Soviet Union is non-existent.
(b) The Soviet Union is viewed with extreme emotions by the British, who either disapprove of it
without knowledge or totally admire it.
(c) The rich are able to exploit the proletariat mainly because the proletariat is not aware of its own
strength.
(d) The capitalists are generally people who are involved in gratifying their self and have no empathy
towards others.


11. Which of the following tones is not displayed by the author in the passage ?
(a) Objective (b) Narrative (c) Descriptive (d) Critical


12. According to the passage, the following four themes appear in the book ' The Animal Farm'. Select the
option which represents the correct sequence in which they occur in the book.
A. The revolting class acquiring a resemblance to the driven out class.
B. Establishment of a new ideology and exploiting the ideology.
C. The ruling elite exploiting those under them.
D. One leader driving out the other.
(a) ACBD (b) CBDA (c) CDBA (d) BACD



13. The following question consists of two words that have a certain relationship with each other followed
by alternatives. Select the alternative that has the same relationship as depicted in the original pair of
words.
Secular: Mundane
(a) preposterous : prudent
(b) transient : fugacious
(c) recalcitrant : authoritative
(d) patent : closed


14. Read the argument and answer the question that follows.
The Government of India has imposed a heavy duty on petrol to discourage the consumption of the
same. The money accrued through the duty is used to subsidize the price charged for the fertilizers
distributed to poor farmers. So, greater the success achieved in meeting the first objective, the lesser
will be the success achieved in meeting the second objective.
The conclusion drawn above is most suitable in which of the following situations?
(a) A public library has imposed a heavy fine to force the borrowers to return the book promptly, when
due. The money accrued from the fines is used to send the reminders to those borrowers who did not
return books on time.
(b) A zoological garden has imposed an additional visitor's tax over the normal entry fees to improve
facilities at the zoo. The money accrued will be used to improve the facilities for the upkeep of the
animals and to improve the recreational facilities at the zoo.
(c) The Delhi Metro Railway Corporation has imposed a user surcharge to prompt commuters to use
other means of transport. The money collected from the taxes will be used to expand the metro
services in other areas.
(d) The Government has imposed a heavy fine to dissuade people from littering in public places. The
money accrued from fines is used to pay overtime to the employees to clean the litter.



15. Given below is a paragraph from which the last sentence has been deleted. From the given options,
choose the sentence that completes the paragraph in the most appropriate way.
While the excellence and superlative quality of our traditional designs are undeniable, design cannot be
said to have a large role to play in our everyday lives today. Being conservative by nature, we do not
seem to care much for the aesthetics of contemporary design — too bleak and spare for our questionable
tastes moulded largely by Bollywood and kitsch, and often bordering on the bizarre. When the rich
build houses, they prefer the excesses of neo-classical architecture to the luxury of 'less is more.'
(a) Hence, our everyday lives are cluttered with cheap imitations and shallow designs.
(b) Thus, traditional designs will always find little or no acceptance in our everyday lives.
(c) For, the grand or what is perceived as grand is regarded as a symbol of power meant to impress and
perhaps even intimidate.
(d) Undoubtedly, popular designs are largely accepted no matter how bizarre they may really be.

16. In the question, four different ways of presenting an idea are given. Choose the one that conforms
most closely to Standard English Usage.
(a) Research is generally a tedious and frustrating process because there are just too much things that
are said about one particular subject and the researcher will be finding the ones relevant to his
research.
(b) The process of research is generally tedious and frustrating because there is just too many things
that are said about one particular subject and the researcher must be finding the ones relevant to his
research.
(c) The process of research is generally tedious and frustrating because there are just too many things
that are said about one particular subject and the researcher must find the ones relevant to his
research.
(d) Generally research is a tedious and frustrating process because there are just too many things that
are said about one particular subject and the researcher must find the ones relevant to his research.


17. There are two blanks in the following sentence. From the pair of words given, choose the one that fills
the blanks most appropriately. The first word in the pair should fill the first blank.
Most of the fifteenth and sixteenth century Mughal gardens were not necessarily intended to look
______________. These gardens were designed to conjure the profound melancholy ensuing from a
sense of the ______________ of natural beauty and human glory.
(a) blitheful....immutability
(b) beautiful....persistence
(c) blissful....simplicity
(d) cheerful....fleetingness



18. Read the argument and answer the question that follows.
Professor: Students in the graduate courses do not write as well as they used to do in the past. Most of
the papers submitted to me by my students have been badly written. These papers also carry lot of
grammatical errors.
Which one of the following is the most serious weakness in the argument made by the professor?
(a) The professor is generalizing about all graduate students on the basis of the submissions of his
students.
(b) There is no proof that the professor is a competent judge of English language.
(c) The argument does not define the criterion for judging a good paper.
(d) The argument does not take into account that the professor is a bad teacher.


19. The question consists of two words that have a certain relationship with each other followed by
alternatives. Select the alternative that has the same relationship as depicted in the original pair of
words.
Formation: Soldiers
(a) club : members
(b) array : numbers
(c) forest : trees
(d) matrix : columns


20. Fill in the blank of the following sentence using one from the idioms provided in the four alternatives.
With a coastline of over 3,000km and a fishing fleet of more than 1,000 vessels, it's ironic that Vietnam
has to import powdered fish from Peru. In a country with huge agricultural potential, this import is like
"_____________".
(a) carrying coals to Newcastle
(b) to take a running jump
(c) raking over the coals
(d) a running battle


21. Given below is a paragraph from which the last sentence that completes the paragraph has been deleted.
From the given options, choose the sentence that completes the paragraph in the most appropriate
way.
How true it is that our children do not belong to us ! We try desperately to give them our thoughts, and
yet they have their own thoughts. As parents, we can house our children's bodies, but not their souls.
When they reach an age of independence, they are finding their way, and they are torn between needing
our help, and needing to be on their own. I remember that feeling clearly. There was such an
excitement about being alive, and I was sure that no one else knew the things that I knew, or felt the
things that I felt. I was learning that parents weren't always right about everything, and some rules
seemed worth breaking. I guess we all go through at least a little rebellion.
_________________________________.
(a) And when this is realized there is also a brief maudlinness accompanied with frequent twinges of
self-abasement in our attitudes, which our parents can easily identify.
(b) And as our children's souls live in the house of tomorrow-a place we cannot visit, not even in our
dreams, even mistakes are part of our journey.
(c) And as parents, we are the bow that sends the living arrows into the future, but it is the Archer (who
guides us) that directs the swiftness and the distance of the arrows, to His directed destination.
(d) And we certainly develop our own thoughts as it is a part of finding ourselves and our capabilities.



Haffner, like Delboeuf, has attempted to explain the act of dreaming by the alteration which an abnormally
introduced condition must have upon the otherwise correct functioning of the intact psychic apparatus; but he
describes this condition in somewhat different terms. He states that the first distinguishing mark of dreams is
the abolition of time and space, i.e., the emancipation of the representation from the individual's position in
the spatial and temporal order. Associated with this is the second fundamental character of dreams, the mistaking
of the hallucinations, imaginations, and fantasy-combinations for objective perceptions. "The sumtotal
of the higher psychic functions, particularly the formation of concepts, judgments, and conclusions on
the one hand, and free self-determination on the other hand, combine with the sensory fantasy-images, and at
all times have these as a substratum". These activities too, therefore, participate in the erratic nature of the
dream-representations. We say they participate, for our faculties of judgment and will are in themselves
unaltered during sleep. As far as their activity is concerned, we are just as shrewd and just as free as in the
waking state.
A man cannot violate the laws of thought; that is, even in a dream he cannot judge things to be identical which
present themselves to him as opposites. He can desire in a dream only that which he regards as a good (sub
ratione boni). But in this application of the laws of thought and will the human intellect is led astray in dreams
by confusing one notion with another. Thus it happens that in dreams we formulate and commit the greatest
of contradictions, while, on the other hand, we display the shrewdest judgment and arrive at the most logical
conclusions, and are able to make the most virtuous and sacred resolutions. "The lack of orientation is the
whole secret of our flights of fantasy in dreams, and the lack of critical reflection and agreement with other
minds is the main source of the reckless extravagances of our judgments, hopes and wishes in dreams"



If the turning-away from the outer world is accepted as the decisive cause of the most conspicuous characteristics
of our dreams, it will be worth our while to consider certain subtle observations of Burdach's, which will
throw some light on the relation of the sleeping psyche to the outer world, and at the same time serve to
prevent our over-estimating the importance of the above deductions. "Sleep," says Burdach, "results only
under the condition that the mind is not excited by sensory stimuli... yet it is not so much a lack of sensory
stimuli that conditions sleep as a lack of interest in them; some sensory impressions are even necessary in so
far as they serve to calm the mind; thus the miller can fall asleep only when he hears the clatter of his mill, and
he who finds it necessary, as a matter of precaution, to burn a light at night, cannot fall asleep in the dark"



22. Which of the following can be inferred to be a cause of dreams ?
(a) The turning-away from the outer world.
(b) Excitation of the sleeping mind by sensory stimuli.
(c) Dissonance experienced with others.
(d) None of the above.


23. The mistaking of the hallucinations in a dream for objective perceptions is associated with which of the
following?
A. Emancipation of representation from the individual's position in the spatial and temporal order.
B. Our faculties of judgment and will being unaltered during sleep.
C. The fact that man can desire in a dream only that which he feels would be good for him.
(a) Only B (b) A and B (c) B and C (d) A and C


24. The author develops the passage by
(a) Showing how Haffner's explanation regarding dreams is different from that of Delboeuf and then
moving on to give more clarity on Haffner's explanation.
(b) Throwing light on Haffner's explanation as regards dreams and then attempting to moderate it.
(c) First discussing the explanations for dreams given by Haffner and then attempting to move on to
Burdach's explanations for more clarity and moderation on the initial discussion.
(d) Discussing Haffner's explanation for dreams and then moving on to Burdach's observations for
moderation on the initial discussion after assuming one of the fundamental assumptions of Burdach
to be true.


25. Fill in the blank of the following sentence using one from the idioms provided in the four alternatives.
Eat carrots for better eyesight, but also know that its excess consumption can turn your skin an orange
hue. Some ____________ are just silly superstitions, but some may just have a nugget of truth.
(a) old heave-hos (b) open sesames
(c) old flames (d) old wives' tales




Saturday, 26 March 2016

RC

Thomas Harris' latest novel is being hailed as the long awaited sequel
to The Silence of the Lambs, but I
have never thought that novel actually needed one. It stood on its
own, finished and complete. After I put
that book down I did not think to ask what Hannibal was going to do
next. In my opinion he had done
enough. I've always preferred a novel that concludes with a few loose
ends because, in life, not all problems
get tied up nice and neat. There was something so frightening, so
giddily uncomfortable about knowing that
Hannibal "The Cannibal" was loose on an unsuspecting world. Author
Harris did readers a favor by letting us
all keep a little of that fear in our hearts and minds for the past 11 years.
But we became so intrigued by Hannibal, didn't we? And we wanted to
see more of him. When we first met
him in Harris's second novel Red Dragon, he was a small but important
player, giving reluctant but brilliant
insights into the mind of a serial killer to FBI agent Will Graham. In
The Silence of the Lambs it was FBI
cadet Clarice Starling looking for a multiple murderer and Lecter
became a major and integral part of the
story. And when we saw Hannibal brought to life by Anthony Hopkins in
the 1991 film, we became hooked.
Rarely before had we been drawn to such an evil character — one who
charmed and hypnotized us with his
combination of verbal gymnastics, Old World manners and awesome
intellectual abilities.




But now there is Hannibal, Harris's latest novel, and this time Dr.
Hannibal Lecter is the player. And like The
Silence of the Lambs, Hannibal is finished and complete and stands on
its own. Quite well in fact.
In Hannibal, Harris plumbs the shadowy depths of Lecter's mind and
throws us into the stinking oubliette
of his psyche, taking us through past — and possibly significant —
remembrances. When we re-ascend,
it is with a startling array of knowledge about the man. We find him
fascinating, sympathetic and — despite
his dietary habits and penchant for killing (and consuming) only the
"rude"— a likable character. I like the
well rounded character that Harris has created, even if he's somewhat
outlandish, flamboyant and deeply
disturbed. Hannibal loves the finer things in life: classical music,
ancient literature, fine art, a tidy evisceration...
The novel's title works, not only because it is about Hannibal; it is
Hannibal. And though the narration is in
the third person, it speaks with his voice. It's a voice of culture
and intelligence; of terror and menace. In
hushed conspiratorial tones, it politely invites us to witness acts of
inhuman horror and suffering. Almost —
almost — making them palatable. And if not palatable, then so
fascinating we find it hard to turn away.
Harris does not write of these atrocities from the moral standpoint of
someone who thinks the things
Hannibal does are wrong; we all know what he does is wrong. Even
Hannibal knows very well what he does
is wrong. He also believes he has the intellectual and moral
superiority to justify his actions, and this is
Harris's triumph in the narration. We are shown things in the way
Hannibal would see them through his
intellectually superior and amoral eyes, and it is up to us to decide
the right or wrongness of things. We
also see things with an almost clinically unprejudiced and sometimes
uncomfortably uncensored eye;
unwavering, unblinking. Harris's prose is elegant and economic.


33. Why does the writer think that the title of the novel Hannibal works?
(a) The title aptly captures the most important aspect of the book.
(b) The author's writing style embodies characteristics of Hannibal's
personality.
(c) The author's narrative is through the eyes of the protagonist
himself and leaves moralistic
judgement to the reader.
(d) The novel is as if it were though a narration by Hannibal himself
which enables the reader to
understand that Hannibal only attacks the rude.


34. Which of the following is admitted by the author in the passage?
(a) Hannibal's actions are morally wrong.
(b) Anthony Hopkins' portrayal of Hannibal increased the popularity of
the series and compelled the
author to write another book.
(c) A character with intellectual superiority and old world manners
can be fascinating even if evil.
(d) Peeping into the mind of Hannibal makes the novel 'Hannibal' a
much more interesting read than
'Silence of the lambs'

.
35. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(a) The fact that readers find a dangerous character like Hannibal
fascinating reveals that morality is
no longer popular with people.
(b) Harris had revealed enough fascinating details about Hannibal's
past in the earlier novels prior to
warrant a third book on the same character.
(c) Hannibal's love for the finer things in life makes him a
fascinating character.
(d) Hannibal evokes sympathy from the readers due to his turbulent
past, which has made him
engage in horrific deeds.

Friday, 25 March 2016

RC1

The passage given below is followed by a set of three questions.
Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.
I was recently shocked to read that several city councils in the UK
are getting ready to expunge everyday
Latin words from the English lexicon. Along with 'via' and 'etc' would
be banished 'viz' and 'i.e.', not to
speak of 'inter alia' and 'bona fide'. There goes away that exotic
literary advantage. It was only recently that
Amrita, my 10-year-old, fighting against a tide of domestic
protestations voted against romantic French
and prevalent Spanish and chose Latin as her second language in middle
school. I had cheered her and
actually promised to help out with the homework, given that three out
of five words in English are of Latin
origin. Blame this vicarious decision on my formative years but
growing up in Mumbai, Latin was never an
option in my school, as our national language Hindi was strictly
enforced. Shiv Sainiks had decreed that
local Marathi was de rigueur for all citizens of the city. I therefore
ended up needing to speak three
additional languages, not to forget Tamil, my mother tongue.
Languages rarely heard have always fascinated me. I always had this
burning desire to speak them,
particularly when my travel stints exposed me to the strangest of
tongues. Language CDs didn't help me
a whole lot. The thing about languages is that though you may be
gifted with the art of penmanship, spoken
word skills are mostly inherited or acquired after birth. I have
always packed my dog-eared phrasebook
along with my toothbrush and shaving cream for my travels. These
haven't helped me much either, often
eliciting that controlled giggle or even outright laughter at my
stuttered attempts. Printed words won't tell
you that Thai is a tonal language with grammatical minefields or
Mandarin and Cantonese have a lilt to
them flowing like Indian ink applied with a Chinese brush. These city
councils argue that they needed to
create a language devoid of such linguistic minefields. However, there
could be far-reaching consequences
in the professional community. Just like abstruse scientific papers
and brain-twisting mathematical theorems,
legal documents are made to sound pompous with Latin words sprinkled
generously all over those reams
of printed matter. With Latin slowly oozing out of our English
dictionary our lawyers will be hard-pressed to
retain their mystifying status quo.

31. Which of the following is a suitable title for the passage?
(a) My Fascination with Languages
(b) Languages Seldom Spoken
(c) Should English be pruned?
(d) Latin: The Legal Language

32. According to the passage, why did the author choose to help his daughter?
(a) The author felt that his daughter's choice of language was
relevant in light of its close links with
English.
(b) The author felt that his daughter's choice of language was
justified given that he had never been
allowed to study Latin.
(c) The author felt that his daughter's choice of language was
practical and much better than
romantic French and prevalent Spanish.
(d) The author felt that his daughter's choice of language was
relevant since it would give her an
exotic literary advantage

33. According to the passage, why have councils in the UK decided to
remove Latin from the English
lexicon?
(a) They feel that the linguistic hurdles in Latin make it difficult
to gain mastery over it.
(b) They want to create a language that does not have the linguistic
problems associated with the
use of Latin.
(c) They find themselves unable to overcome the linguistic hurdles
provided by Latin.
(d) They want to create a language that will help them remove the
ambiguities associated with the
use of Latin which has now become an obsolete language.

Wednesday, 23 March 2016

RC1

The history of human growth and development is at the same time the
history of the terrible struggle of every
new idea heralding the approach of a brighter dawn. In its tenacious
hold on tradition, the Old has never
hesitated to make use of the foulest and cruelest means to avoid the
advent of the New, in whatever form or
period the latter may have asserted itself. We need not retrace our
steps into the distant past to realize the
enormity of opposition, difficulties, and hardships placed in the path
of every progressive idea. The rack, the
thumbscrew, and the knout are still with us; so are the convict's garb
and the social wrath, all conspiring
against the spirit that is serenely marching on. Anarchism could not
hope to escape the fate of all other ideas
of innovation. Indeed, as the most revolutionary and uncompromising
innovator, Anarchism must meet with
the combined ignorance and venom of the world it aims to reconstruct.
The strange phenomenon of the opposition to Anarchism is that it
brings to light the relation between socalled
intelligence and ignorance. And yet this is not so very strange when
we consider the relativity of all
things. The ignorant mass has in its favor that it makes no pretense
of knowledge or tolerance. Acting, as it
always does, by mere impulse, its reasons are like those of a child.
"Why?" "Because." Yet the opposition of
the uneducated to Anarchism deserves the same consideration as that of
the intelligent man.

What, then, are the objections? First, Anarchism is impractical,
though a beautiful ideal. Second, Anarchism
stands for violence and destruction, hence it must be repudiated as
vile and dangerous. Both the intelligent
man and the ignorant mass judge not from a thorough knowledge of the
subject, but either from hearsay or
false interpretation.
A practical scheme, says Oscar Wilde, is either one already in
existence, or a scheme that could be carried out
under the existing conditions; but it is exactly the existing
conditions that one objects to, and any scheme that
could accept these conditions is wrong and foolish. The true criterion
of the practical, therefore, is not
whether the latter can keep intact the wrong or foolish; rather is it
whether the scheme has vitality enough to
leave the stagnant waters of the old, and build, as well as sustain,
new life. In the light of this conception,
Anarchism is indeed practical. More than any other idea, it is helping
to do away with the wrong and foolish;
more than any other idea, it is building and sustaining new life.
The emotions of the ignorant man are continuously kept at a pitch by
the most blood-curdling stories about
Anarchism. Not a thing too outrageous to be employed against this
philosophy and its exponents. Therefore
Anarchism represents to the unthinking what the proverbial bad man
does to the child,—a black monster bent
on swallowing everything; in short, destruction and violence.
Destruction and violence! How is the ordinary man to know that the
most violent element in society is
ignorance; that its power of destruction is the very thing Anarchism
is combating? Nor is he aware that
Anarchism, whose roots, as it were, are part of nature's forces,
destroys, not healthful tissue, but parasitic
growths that feed on the life's essence of society. It is merely
clearing the soil from weeds and sagebrush, that
it may eventually bear healthy fruit. Someone has said that it
requires less mental effort to condemn than to
think. The widespread mental indolence, so prevalent in society,
proves this to be only too true. Rather than
to go to the bottom of any given idea, to examine into its origin and
meaning, most people will either condemn
it altogether, or rely on some superficial or prejudicial definition
of non-essentials.

48. The passage is primarily concerned with
(1) identifying the contribution of the old ideologies to the present world
(2) exposing the dubious character of the intelligent men
(3) the novelty value of the idea of anarchism and its understanding
(4) revealing the untimely death of progressive ideas
(5) to express support to the basic idea of violence and destruction

49. Which of the following best describes the function of the fourth paragraph?
(1) To identify the flaws in the pragmatic and anarchistic approach
(2) To describe the complimentary relationship between the existing
condition and anarchism
(3) To revert to the objections of the disbelievers of anarchism by
magnifying its true pragmatic approach
(4) To refute Oscar Wilde's beliefs about the existing world and the
practical scheme
(5) To identify the misgivings of the people toward Oscar Wilde's theory

50. By the author's statements, it can be inferred that she would be
most likely to agree with which one of
the following?
(1) The ignorant man's ignorance is not only employed by the lack of
his own understanding but also
by the efforts of those who want them to be oblivious.
(2) The acceptance of new ideas depends on that community of people
which propagates those ideas
(3) Anarchism dichotomizes the intelligent from the ignorant and
destroys those who have been thriving
in society as parasites.
(4) The only pragmatic way is the present one which presents the
correct order of things as proposed by
our ancestors.
(5) That intelligence often gives way to Anarchism and is just a tool
for the erudite to discuss in their
living rooms.


51. The author is outraged by the judgement of anarchism from both the
ignorant and intelligent men
because
(1) their judgement is consistent with the exponents of anarchism
(2) their judgement is based on religion and social ethics
(3) their judgement is in opposition with the views of proponents of anarchism
(4) their judgement is based on unsubstantiated information and misconceptions
(5) their judgement is based on selfish motives

52. The tone of the author can be described as:
(1) adulatory (2) sympathetic (3) opinionated (4) equivocal (5) reverential

What's the largest number you can represent with 3 digits ?

FROM NOTIFICATIONS

What's the largest number you can represent with 3 digits ?

Like
Like
Love
Haha
Wow
Sad
Angry
Comment
Comments
Bitan Chattopadhyay
Like · Reply · 1 · Just now
Akhil Cv
Akhil Cv 9^9^9
Like · Reply · Just now
Tanveer Iqbal Ahmed
Tanveer Iqbal Ahmed Some interesting views here -https://www.facebook.com/writetotanveer/posts/10153484910602584?pnref=story
Tanveer Iqbal Ahmed
11 hrs · 

What is the largest number that can be made with 3 digits?

Tanveer Iqbal Ahmed
Write a comment...

Sunday, 20 March 2016

RC 1

What is wrong with the modern literary novel? Why is it so worthy and
dull? Why is it so anxious? Why is it
so bloody boring? Well, let's go back a bit first. Two and a half
thousand years ago, at the time of Aristophanes,
the Greeks believed that comedy was superior to tragedy: tragedy was
the merely human view of life (we
sicken, we die). But comedy was the gods' view, from on high: our
endless and repetitive cycle of suffering,
our horror of it, our inability to escape it. The big, drunk, flawed,
Greek gods watched us for entertainment,
like a dirty, funny, violent, repetitive cartoon. And the best of the
old Greek comedy tried to give us that
relaxed, amused perspective on our flawed selves. We became as gods,
laughing at our own follies.
Many of the finest novels—and certainly the novels I love most—are in
the Greek comic tradition, rather than
the tragic: Rabelais, Cervantes, Swift, Voltaire, and on through to
Joseph Heller's Catch-22 and the late Kurt
Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse 5.
Yet western culture since the middle ages has overvalued the tragic
and undervalued the comic. We think of
tragedy as major, and comedy as minor. Brilliant comedies never win
the best film Oscar. The Booker prize
leans toward the tragic. In 1984, Martin Amis reinvented Rabelais in
his comic masterpiece Money. The best
English novel of the 1980s, it didn't even make the shortlist. Anita
Brookner won that year, for Hotel du Lac,
written, as the Observer put it, "with a beautiful grave formality."
The fault is in the culture. But it is also in the writers, who
self-limit and self-censor. If the subject is big,
difficult and serious, the writer tends to believe the treatment must
be in the tragic mode. When Amis addressed
the Holocaust in his minor novel Time's Arrow (1991), he switched off
the jokes, and the energy, and was
rewarded with his only Booker shortlisting.
But why this pressure, from within and without? There are two good
reasons. The first is the west's unexamined
cultural cringe before the Greeks. For most of the last 500 years,
Homer and Sophocles have been held to be
the supreme exponents of their arts. (Even Homer's constant repetition
of stock phrases like "rosy-fingered
dawn" and "wine-dark sea" are praised, rather than recognised as
tiresome clichés.)
The second reason is that our classical inheritance is lop-sided. We
have a rich range of tragedies—Sophocles,
Aeschylus and Euripides (18 by Euripides alone). Of the comic writers,
only Aristophanes survived. In an age
of kings, time is a filter that works against comedy. Plays that say,
"Boy, it's a tough job, leading a nation"
tend to survive; plays that say, "Our leaders are dumb arseholes, just
like us" tend not to.
More importantly, Aristotle's work on tragedy survived; his work on
comedy did not. We have the classical
rules for the one but not the other, and this has biased the
development of all western literature. We've been
off-centre ever since. But of course Europe in the middle ages was
peculiarly primed to rediscover tragedy:
the one church spoke in one voice, drawn from one book, and that book
was at heart tragic. The church had
somehow been built on the gospel of the poor.


46. According to the author, the intrinsic reason for the predilection
for tragedies lies in:
(1) The internalization of tragedy by the writers.
(2) The socio-cultural pressure on the writers.
(3) The Greek way of thinking of the writers.
(4) The lure of the prizes for the writers.
(5) The submission to all things Greek by the writers.

47. According to the passage, which one of the following did not
contribute to the spread of tragedy?
(1) The fact that tragedies have survived over time.
(2) The fact that Europe was full of tragedies.
(3) The reality that the church spoke the voice of the poor.
(4) The fact that classical rules exist for tragedy.
(5) The fact that Greek gods appreciated comedy.


48. The tone of the passage is:
(1) Questioning
(2) Sarcastic
(3) Analytical
(4) Critical
(5) Humorous

Wednesday, 16 March 2016

RC 18.03

It is said that for a corporation, the 'unhappy customers are its
greatest source of learning' and these words are frequently used in
business meetings and training workshops for employees engaged in
customer relationship management (CRM) activities. These famous words
were spoken by Bill Gates, at that time, when the world was
re-discovering the art of listening to the customers by implementing
better CRM practices.

A company could discover important insights from their customers
(whether happy or unhappy) and use these insights to improve processes
and products so that they can make it better for their future
customers. So when Whirlpool launched their washing machines way back
in India, they listened to their 'unhappy customers' and realized that
the typical Indian dress such as a saree or a dhoti were too big to be
washed properly in their machines. Hence, they did some product
redesign and launched a series of washing machines catering to the
Indian customer's needs – and this translated to increased sales and
market share for the company.

Some companies even went out and made drastic changes in their product
offerings – changes that were fundamentally opposite to their
corporate strategy – after they listened to their 'unhappy customers'.
Some of the examples are KFC (Kentucky Fried Chicken) offering a
'vegetable thali' to their customers in Delhi and Maxwell House Coffee
repositioning their product as a 'fruit drink' to attract Jewish
customers during the fasting season of 'Passover' in Israel. Companies
like Starbucks learned from their 'happy customers' that integrating
the shop design to suit the local culture was the key to success and
they started implementing this strategy with great success in their
global expansion.

Hence, there always was something to be learnt from the customers and
this has been the fundamental motivation for all CRM aficionados.
However, in the last couple of years, since the advent of a new kind
of communication medium, the customers have been empowered to reach
out to millions of other customers in a matter of seconds and this has
drastically changed the way in which they can share their experiences
about products and services – and the way in which companies can
respond (if at all) to such information.

This new medium called 'social media' has proved to be a game-changer
in the way people communicate with other people. So, when an American
Airlines customer was not happy with the way the cabin crew behaved
with him, he simply went ahead and posted his experience on a social
networking site which went viral i.e. got read and shared by millions
of other people, and within days, the Airways had to compensate him
for 'shutting up'. Incidentally, American Airlines is designated as
'most hated' on social media according to a research done by Amplicate
in October, 2011.

In such a communication environment, where any negative experience can
be shared with so many people instantaneously, the new reality for a
corporation is that the 'unhappy customers are its greatest source of
pain'.



1.According to the passage, how has social media changed the role that
unhappy customers play in a company's strategy?
a)
Unhappy customers are now more forthright in providing feedback to the
companies through the new communication channel called social media.
b)
Social media has made it easier for customers to voice negative
sentiments against any company.
c)
Unhappy customers can easily publicize their negative feedback against
any company and can rapidly damage the reputation of the company.
d)
Unhappy customers use social media to publicize their criticisms more
than happy customers do to publicize their commendations.


2.DIRECTIONS for question 2: Select one or more answer choices
according to the directions given in the question.



Which of the following can be inferred with reference to the phrase
"new reality for a corporation" mentioned in the last paragraph of the
passage?



Select all that apply:

a)
Listening to unhappy customers will result in companies making changes
diametrically opposite to their corporate strategy.
b)
Since unhappy customers are able to share their negative feedback
rapidly, companies sometimes cannot address these issues in time.
c)
There is more to learn for companies from its unhappy customers and
not doing so will cause a great damage to the company's reputation.
d)
Unhappy customers can damage a company's reputation by filing
complaints in the consumer court.



3.According to the passage, what was the primary reason for American
Airlines being designated as 'most hated' on social media in October
2011?
a)
The customer who was not happy with the service provided by American
Airlines used social media to publicize his experience which resulted
in American Airlines being designated as the 'most hated' on social
media.
b)
American Airlines, instead of apologizing and promising a better
service in the future, tried to pay the customer who was not happy
with their service to stop publicizing his experience which was not
received well by the users of social media.
c)
The service of American Airlines was poor in general and the example
of the customer provided in the passage is only one among many.
d)
The incident of the customer given in the passage may or may not have
played a part in American Airlines being designated as 'most hated' on
social media and there is not enough information given in the passage
to deduce the exact reason.

4.The changes introduced by KFC and Maxwell House Coffee, as mentioned
in the passage, would be best described as
a)
oxymoronic.
b)
paradoxical.
c)
superficial.
d)
chicane.


**********************


Police-induced false confessions have long been recognized as one of
the leading causes of miscarriages of justice in America.
Nevertheless, the incidence and prevalence of false confessions is not
presently known.

There are at least three reasons why this statistic has eluded
investigators. First, for the most part custodial interrogation is
conducted in secret: Police question suspects in private, and
typically do not record the entire interrogation in stenographic,
audio or video form. Second, police do not keep records or collect
statistics on the number or frequency of accusatory interrogations
they conduct. Therefore, we know neither how often suspects are
interrogated nor how often they confess, whether truthfully or
falsely. Third, many cases of false confession are likely to go
entirely unreported. Even in reported cases it is frequently difficult
to unequivocally establish the ground truth about the crime,
especially since in confession driven prosecutions the suspect is
likely to be convicted. Because it is not possible to reliably
estimate the actual number of unknown false confessions, it is also
impossible to estimate how often false confessions lead to wrongful
convictions.

Nevertheless, at least three sources of empirical evidence suggest
that false confessions occur regularly: case studies, laboratory
research, and these authors' published and unpublished study of
interrogations that result in false confession. First, in recent years
scholars and journalists have documented numerous cases of
psychologically induced false confessions in America. Because a
multitude of factors contribute to false confessions going unnoticed,
unreported or unacknowledged, it is reasonable to presume that the
reported cases represent the tip of the iceberg. Only the most
egregious and high profile cases involving demonstrably false
confessions are likely to be written about in the academic or the
popular literature.

Second, psychological research has demonstrated through controlled
laboratory experimentation that a very commonly used interrogation
technique has a coercive impact on suspects and is thus likely to be a
source of false confession. Kassin and McNall (1991) examined how the
sentencing expectations of seventy-five subjects were affected by the
two prongs of the accident strategy: "maximization" (i.e.,
exaggerating the strength of the evidence, magnitude of the charges,
or seriousness of the offense) and "minimization" (i.e., playing down
the strength of the evidence, magnitude of the charges or seriousness
of the offense). Using the video-tape of a police interrogation and
accompanying transcript but varying the information presented, Kassin
and McNall (1991) found that through "pragmatic implication,"
maximization effectively communicates a threat of harm, while
minimization communicates a promise of leniency. The technique is
advocated by the leading interrogation training manual and commonly
used in practice.

Reading "between the lines," suspects exposed to these tactics infer
harsh or lenient sentencing outcomes just as if the differing
consequences had been blatantly threatened or promised. Both direct
and indirect techniques for communicating threats or promises rely on
the same logic to precipitate a suspect's decision to confess. They
change the result of the person's rational calculation about what to
do through the introduction of a strong incentive to confess, and/or a
strong disincentive to remain silent. The modern interrogator's shift
from a direct to an indirect method for communicating benefits or
harms is little more than a method for eliciting confessions by
circumventing well-established legal protections.

Third, these authors have discovered numerous examples of probable or
confirmed false confessions. One line of research involves the
analysis of well over 150 interrogation transcripts, and the analysis
of sworn testimony describing interrogations. The second line involves
studying nearly 200 interrogations, interviewing approximately 100
police interrogators, analysing interrogation transcripts, and
collecting data on approximately 175 likely or proven post-Miranda era
false confessions. Both lines of inquiry have led to repeated
observations of the process whereby interrogators manipulate suspects
and coerce or persuade them to confess to crimes that they did not
commit. In some interrogations, such as those directed against the
mentally handicapped, false confessions can be elicited rapidly and
with minimal inducements. Most often, however, eliciting a false
confession takes strong incentives, intense pressure and prolonged
questioning.



5.Which of the following statements can be the closest inference from
the author's statement when he talks about modern investigators
"circumventing well-established legal protections"?
a)
Confessions drawn through pragmatic implication cannot be used to
convict a suspect in the court of law.
b)
Any technique, direct or indirect, that communicates threats and
impacts a suspect's decision to confess is illegal.
c)
Eliciting a confession from a suspect by directly threatening or by
directly communicating benefits to the suspect is illegal.
d)
It is easier and less time consuming to obtain a confession using
indirect methods rather than through direct methods.


6.Which of the following instances most accurately represents an
example of maximization technique?
a)
An interrogator threatens the suspect that unless he confesses, the
interrogation is not going to end.
b)
An interrogator tells the suspect that officers found his finger
prints on the murder weapon, even if they did not.
c)
An interrogator tells the suspect that the crime is justified because
the victim would have provoked him.
d)
An interrogator seemingly sympathizes with the suspect and tries to
elicit more information from the suspect.


7.DIRECTIONS for questions 7 and 8: Select one or more answer choices
according to the directions given in the question.



Which of the following statements represent(s) a source of empirical
evidence which suggests that false confessions occur regularly?



Select all that apply:

a)
Academic study of high profile cases which involve false confessions.
b)
Research about the psychological impact of established interrogatory techniques.
c)
Analysis of a number of interrogation transcripts through data
collection on false confessions.
d)
Analysing the confessions of suspects in those cases where the ground
truth about the crime has been established.


8.DIRECTIONS for questions 7 and 8: Select one or more answer choices
according to the directions given in the question.



According to the passage, which of the following statements can be
inferred from the psychological research conducted through "controlled
laboratory experimentation"?



Select all that apply:

a)
The accident strategy blatantly communicates threats and/or benefits
to the suspect and results in false confessions.
b)
The accident strategy is effective for communicating threats rather
than for communicating benefits.
c)
The accident strategy coerces the suspect into providing false
confession by communicating veiled threats and benefits.
d)
The accident strategy is one of the primary techniques used for
eliciting false confessions from suspects.


*********************************



All over the world, languages are being lost at an alarming rate.
Field linguists do their best to preserve these languages, but find
their speaker communities apathetic. "Why should I learn
Wotʃa-Korlitt?" they ask, "It's Spanish I need to get a job." We need
to look at successful languages, whose speakers are engaged with their
language, to see what endangered languages can learn from them. When
we do, we inevitably find that the most successful languages are those
which possess a tradition of prescriptivist grammar. English has an
army of armchair pedants who tell us all to never split an infinitive,
that the passive should be avoided, and that prepositions must not be
used to end a sentence with. French has the Academie Française to
pronounce arbitrary bans on loanwords, and Spanish the Real Academia
Española, which aims to ensure everybody talks like Cervantes. The
Chinese are taught from an early age to regard all Sinitic languages
as dialects of Mandarin.

All these languages were originally documented by their own speakers,
who made up arbitrary rules to show off their own cleverness. The
results are invigorating. Such rules are endlessly debated, denounced,
defended and defied, and as a result, the speakers care about their
language.

Contrast the situation with endangered languages. These are documented
by outsiders, schooled in the descriptivist method, and content to
simply record what they find. Their work may result in a Bible
translation, but that is as close to arbitrary commandments as they're
likely to get.

A new approach is necessary. Fieldworkers should no longer passively
describe a language. They must set out to create new rules for the
language, so as to stimulate the debate that keeps a language alive.
As such rules must be internally unmotivated, the researcher needs to
think carefully about where to obtain them. A good strategy is to copy
rules from a language that the speaker community considers
prestigious, as English pedants do with Latin. In South America,
Spanish or Portuguese would be the first choice, although it may be
wise to base rules on the European form of the language rather than
the local one. This approach has two advantages – those who accept the
new rule will see it as conferring the prestige of the dominant
language on their own, whereas those who reject it will see the
dominant language as tainted by association with the hated rule.

Other researchers may prefer to manufacture rules based on theoretical
considerations. This raises the question of which framework to use for
the purpose. On one level, it makes little difference, as they will
all be equally incomprehensible to the speaker community, but I would
recommend Metasyntactic Heuristics, since it is now understood only by
two aging academics in remote English universities, and they haven't
spoken to each other for 25 years.

Our fieldworkers are now reporting back from the first trials of this
method. We are still analysing their findings, but one has reported
spectacular results from convincing an Amazonian tribe that they are
not allowed to discuss abstract concepts.



9.According to the passage, what can field linguists who are trying to
prevent a language from becoming endangered learn from successful
languages?
a)
The apathy of the speakers of successful languages that can be
replicated in the speaker communities of endangered languages.
b)
The importance of arbitrary rules in the successful languages which
results in speakers caring about their language.
c)
The benefits provided by learning a successful language which are not
present in endangered languages.
d)
The importance of academies like Academie Française for French, Real
Academia Española for Spanish, in keeping a language alive.


10.The fundamental difference between the prescriptivist and the
descriptivist method of studying a language, as can be inferred from
the passage, is that the prescriptivist method
a)
is used in successful languages whereas descriptivist method is used
in endangered languages.
b)
results in speakers of the language becoming apathetic whereas
descriptivist method results in speakers who are passionate about
their language.
c)
involves creation of arbitrary rules to spark linguistic debates
whereas descriptivist method involves passive description of a
language.
d)
is mostly applicable for European languages whereas descriptivist
method is applicable for Native American languages.



11.When the author humourously states that, "English has an army of
armchair pedants… to end a sentence with," he is most likely resorting
to which of the following literary devices?
a)
Irony
b)
Parody
c)
Hyperbole
d)
Allusion


12.DIRECTIONS for question 12: Select one or more answer choices
according to the directions given in the question.



According to the passage, which of the following strategies can help
in keeping languages alive?



Select all that apply:

a)
Manufacturing rules on the basis of a theoretical framework which will
spark debate and improve the connection between speakers and
languages.
b)
Borrowing linguistic guidelines from a dominant language which will
improve the prestige of the endangered language in the eyes of the
speaker community.
c)
Creating new rules borrowed from a dominant language which will result
in the dominant language losing its reputation in the eyes of the
speakers of the endangered language.
d)
Manufacturing rules according to the preferences of the field
researcher such that he can modify and improve the endangered
language.



*********************************



The mystical approaches to the study of creativity have probably made
it harder for scientific psychologists to be heard. Many people seem
to believe, as they do about love, that creativity is something that
just doesn't lend itself to scientific study, because it is a
spiritual process. We believe that it has been hard for the scientific
approach to shake the deep-seated view of some people that, somehow,
scientific psychologists are treading where they should not.
Equally damaging to the scientific study of creativity, in our view,
has been the takeover of the field, in the popular mind, by those who
follow what might be referred to as a pragmatic approach. Those taking
this approach have been concerned primarily with developing
creativity, secondarily with understanding it, but almost not at all
with testing the validity of their ideas about it.

Perhaps the foremost proponent of this approach is Edward De Bono,
whose work on lateral thinking and other aspects of creativity has had
what appears to be considerable commercial success. De Bono's concern
is not with theory, but with practice. For example, he suggests using
a tool that focuses on the aspects of an idea that are pluses,
minuses, and interesting (such as PMI). Or he suggests using the word
po, derived from hypothesis, suppose, possible, and poetry, to provoke
rather than judge ideas. Another tool, that of "thinking hats," has
individuals metaphorically wear different hats, such as a white hat
for data-based thinking, a red hat for intuitive thinking, a black hat
for critical thinking, and a green hat for generative thinking, in
order to stimulate seeing things from different points of view.

De Bono is not alone in this enterprise. Osborn (1953), based on his
experiences in advertising agencies, developed the technique of
brainstorming to encourage people to solve problems creatively by
seeking many possible solutions in an atmosphere that is constructive
rather than critical and inhibitory. Gordon (1961) also attempted to
simulate creative thinking by a method called synectics, which
primarily involves analogies.

More recently, authors such as Adams (1974/1986) and Von Oech (1983)
have suggested that people often construct a series of false beliefs
that interfere with creative functioning. For example, some people
believe that there is only one right answer and that ambiguity must be
avoided whenever possible. People can become creative by identifying
and removing these mental blocks. Also, Von Oech has suggested that we
need to adopt the roles of explorer, artist, judge, and warrior in
order to foster our creative productivity.

These approaches have had considerable public visibility, in much the
way that Leo Buscaglia has given visibility to the study of love. And
they may well be useful. From our point of view as psychologists,
however, these approaches lack any basis in serious psychological
theory, as well as serious empirical attempts to validate them. Of
course, techniques can work in the absence of psychological theory or
validation. But the effect of such approaches is often to leave people
associating a phenomenon with commercialization and to see it as less
than a serious endeavour for psychological study.



13.According to the passage, the similarity between mystical approach
and the pragmatic approach to the study of creativity is that both the
approaches
a)
contribute to the scientific study of creativity by providing
knowledge about the nature of creativity.
b)
serve as road blocks to the scientific study of creativity.
c)
use techniques for fostering creativity among individuals.
d)
are similar to the study of love.


14.The similarity between the various pragmatic approaches proposed by
the authors in the passage is that these approaches
a)
rely on empirical evidence to validate the theories related to these approaches.
b)
are easily comprehensible to the common man.
c)
are all commercially successful.
d)
provide constructs for thinking creatively.

15.According to the author, the major shortcoming common to all the
pragmatic approaches mentioned in the passage is that
a)
these approaches do not yield any results.
b)
these approaches are only a means of commercializing the study of creativity.
c)
these approaches are not validated through evidence.
d)
the popularity of these approaches hinder the scientific study of creativity.

16.Which of the following would most likely be a technique in the
creative thinking method called synectics mentioned in the passage?
a)
The original problem is alienated by creating a comparable situation
to develop creative solutions.
b)
Participants assume different roles to develop solutions with
different points of view.
c)
Participants do not reject any theory and listen to all possible
solutions with an open mind.
d)
The repercussions of every solution are considered so that the optimal
solution can be determined.